RESEARCH

Risk Taking Rises with Inflation Expectations

Insights derived from Fidelity's Institutional Investor Innovation Study can help institutions assess risk and opportunity and the best path forward in a time of profound change and heightened volatility in global financial markets.

Fidelity's Jake Weinstein examines the key takeaways and what's top of mind for institutional investors.

Institutions are experiencing tension between dialing up risk or challenging the consensus.

Rising concern about addressing inflation is now top of mind for institutional investors. Compared to fall of 2021, more institutions believe we've entered a secular period of higher inflation: 40% versus 24% previously. Importantly, 78% of institutions increased their near-term inflation expectations over the past year. They expect an average inflation rate over the next two years of 4.8%. Institutions indicated they would turn to traditional inflation-hedging assets, such as real estate, shorter duration bonds, commodities, or Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS). However, support for cryptocurrencies as an inflation hedge declined to 6% from 16% in our previous survey.

More risk-taking to achieve similar returns.

Nearly half of institutions (43%) indicated they're taking on more total risk than three years ago, up from 39% reported in the last survey. A majority of those surveyed—62%—said they are comfortable with the level of risk they are taking in their portfolios. Of those respondents, 68% attributed their comfort level to their current strategic asset allocation.

Inflation expectations: transitory or secular?

Fall 2021Spring 2022UnsureSecularTransitory23%27%24%40%53%32%

How concerned are you about your ability to mitigate rising inflation?

2%33%17%42%CONCERNED48%7%
“We are taking on moretotal risk in our portfoliothan three years ago.”43%Up from 39% in 2021

A New Dimension to Benchmarking Portfolio and Organizational Performance

For almost 20 years, Fidelity has been conducting primary research to understand decision-making among institutional investors and provide a benchmark for firms of varying types and sizes. Using a new framework we call the Investment Innovators Curve, this year's study seeks to help firms define and understand the philosophical drivers of their organization and their investment approach.

With macroeconomic changes potentially on the horizon, organizations are beginning to see headwinds that will pressure them to squeeze returns out of lower yields and with a higher risk profile. This may be a natural time for reflection on how your firm will navigate these changes. We believe that adapting and applying the Investment Innovators Curve can provide investors with new and meaningful insights into the levers that they and their peers push on while pursuing their portfolio objectives.

Investment leaders can consider where they sit on the Investment Innovators Curve, based on their organization's ability and willingness to experiment with new investment approaches or asset classes. Where does your firm fall on the curve? .

Investment Innovators Curve

Trailblazers:

"We are frequently one of the first to try a new asset class or investment approach, even if it's extremely new and/or unproven."

Adaptives:

"We are not the first to try a new asset class or investment approach, but will quickly follow if we notice others are trying it.

Methodicals:

"We are curious about new asset classes or investment approaches, but are more pragmatic. We'll wait until it's more common/ established before investing."

Reactives:

"We adopt a new asset class or investment approach out of necessity. Once it's mainstream and has clear, demonstrated value, we'll invest in it."

Traditionalists:

"We are very risk-averse when adding new asset classes or investment approaches to our portfolio. We would rather be late to a new investing trend than bear the potential risks involved with new approaches."

Download the executive summary

 
 

There was an issue with your input

 
 
 

Please confirm