Should investors be concerned about the midterms
The midterm investment cycle is real, but it’s not a trading rule and it shouldn’t be used as a primary market predictor.
- Stocks have historically been weaker before midterms and stronger afterward, but this pattern reflects changing policy uncertainty—not election outcomes.
- Uncertainty typically peaks ahead of elections and then eases afterward—especially with divided government—helping risk premiums fall and equities rerate higher.
- Business spending and earnings remain strong, and historically, both have been more important drivers of the market than election timing.
- With earnings growth at historically low levels, conditions have often preceded gains—with about 88% odds of a positive market over the next 12 months when starting from a similar trough.
Next steps to consider
Quantitative Investing
Find out how a blend of human insight, data, and technology can help uncover opportunity for your clients.
Learn more
Asset class solutions
Build your clients' portfolios with our diverse investment capabilities across all asset classes.
Learn more
Fidelity active ETFs
Backed by decades of active management expertise, Fidelity active ETFs can help you transform challenges into opportunities for your clients.
Learn more
Related insights
View all
For important information, see the full linked content.