SERIES

Insight & Outlook: Fidelity Market Signals Weekly

Introducing new weekly insights from Fidelity Institutional's (FI) Capital Markets Strategy Group covering the latest market trends, economic developments, and key factors shaping investment decisions—all to help you and your clients navigate the markets with confidence.


What could reduce the market’s increasing dependence on AI leaders?

Concentration risk may merit investors reviewing their allocation to stocks tied to artificial intelligence.


The headline S&P 500 has remained close to its highs, but the calm at the index level masks turbulence underneath.

  • Fewer stocks are driving the market advance.
  • Mega-cap stocks are doing the heavy lifting.
  • The equal-weight market looks less resilient, trailing the cap-weighted index.
Key takeaway
  • Why should investors take note of the reliance on a limited number of stocks? While not inherently a concern, market concentration like investors are experiencing today has been associated with many technology advances throughout history. However, it may be problematic if it increases dependence on a single theme, possibly undermining what on the surface seems to be a well-diversified portfolio.
  • What could reduce the market’s dependence on AI leaders? Valuation pressures and stronger earnings growth in sectors not tied to AI each could play a role.
  • What should investors be thinking regarding this AI-driven market concentration? Rather than trying to predict a rotation, investors may want to ask whether portfolios remain diversified across sectors, styles, regions, and sources of return.
  • How might advisors frame a portfolio conversation with their clients? We are not suggesting investors should abandon mega-cap growth. Rather, it’s a good time to meet with your clients to make sure one theme, sector, or group of companies has not quietly become most of their portfolios.

It’s no secret the equity market continues to be led by a small group of large companies: This year, it has been more concentrated among the top 10 components than at any time in the past 100 years (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1: Top 3,000 stocks market concentration % (top 10 stocks).


As mega-cap growth and AI-linked stocks have widened their lead over most S&P 500 components in recent weeks, the broadening that we expected in 2026 has yet to materialize in a durable way. Investors have repeatedly expected market leadership to broaden, only to see AI-related leadership reasserted, supported by strong earnings growth.

Is the high market concentration really a problem? It hasn’t been. As we’ve written many times, leadership cycles in the past started with a small group of companies tied to a major economic transition (railroads, internet platforms, and more). It’s historically common.

Here’s the potential rub: What happens if AI companies become less dominant contributors to future returns?

As of early October, a string of positive earnings surprises from a handful of companies have supported the market. The opposite could also become true at some point: Earnings that surprise less to the upside could negatively affect the S&P 500.

Also, valuation pressure from higher rates (absent an improving economy) or earnings growth in sectors not as closely tied to AI could reduce the market’s dependence on the mega-cap AI leaders over time.

What could reduce the market’s dependence on AI leaders?

In no way are we arguing that investors should abandon their core equity allocations in a concentrated market.

However, they may need to think more deliberately about diversification. We think a broadening of the historically concentrated market—something we’ve anticipated this year—may still happen for three key reasons:

  1. Strong earnings growth could eventually expand beyond AI-focused technology.
  2. Higher rates absent an improving economy could create valuation pressure for the market’s most richly valued companies.
  3. AI investments could start to shift from infrastructure providers to AI adopters, which include more small cap, mid cap, and international value plays.

What actions should investors take?

If investors haven’t already, it’s likely time to review portfolio diversification with their advisors. Market concentration is increasingly thematic, not just equity-specific. Capital spending, earnings growth, and performance across multiple asset classes are becoming more closely tied to the AI theme. These dynamics extend across public investment-grade fixed income, private equity, credit markets, and real estate.

Even a portfolio that appears well diversified by asset class may still have meaningful exposure to the same underlying AI-related theme.

For extreme portfolios, advisors may want to:

  • Trim outsized client positions back toward intended weights.
  • Complement market-cap-weighted exposure with more balanced approaches.
  • Consider active strategies where dispersion is rising.
  • Look at allocation balance by sector, style, and region, not just by asset class.
  • Review aggregate AI exposure across client portfolios.

Within equities, advisors might consider whether small and mid cap allocations remain appropriately represented in client portfolios. Many of those components are underrepresented in mega-cap-heavy benchmarks, including regional banks, industrial suppliers, health care services, consumer cyclicals, and domestically focused businesses.

Many of these stocks may also be resilient valuation plays. Dozens of them enter the fourth quarter with lower price-to-earnings ratios, greater sensitivity to financing conditions, and more room for operating leverage if demand remains resilient.

Conclusion

Today's market concentration reflects the extraordinary business success of a small group of companies. Their leadership has been supported by strong earnings growth and continued customer spending.

Could the market broaden from here? It might.

Even if it doesn’t, investors may be underestimating the need for diversification.

Previous weekly market commentaries

Commentary
Rethinking the "40" in 60/40 portfolios
Look beyond the headlines: The biggest portfolio construction story may not be what is happening inside the “60,” but the growing possibilities inside the “40.”
Commentary
Is the rate hike and a rising 10-year Treasury ominous?
A Fed rate hike, 10-year Treasury yields near 5%, and rising oil prices present the kind of backdrop that can end bull markets. Look closer, however, and there are reasons to think de-risking portfolios early could be a mistake.
Commentary
The intersection of the AI buildout and the bond market is a funding test
AI demand remains powerful. The next market signal may come from how the buildout is financed—and what that financing does to rates, credit, and equity valuations.
Commentary
Have bond yields gone too far—or just far enough?
Long-term Treasury yields have climbed to nearly two-decade highs, testing equities, housing, corporate borrowers, and traditional portfolio construction. But the same sell-off may also be creating a more compelling entry point for duration—and a chance to earn meaningful income from high-quality bonds.
Commentary
Are stock market record highs a warning sign?
U.S. equities remain near record highs, and the instinct to wait for a pullback is understandable. But history suggests all-time highs may be better embraced than shunned: Since 1920, investing at record highs has produced forward returns in line with—or better than—other entry points.
Commentary
Historic earnings growth is giving investors a reason for optimism
Corporate profit growth hasn’t been this strong in more than four years, and it’s arguably the biggest catalyst behind investment and economic growth expectations.

Meet the FI Capital Markets team

The FI Capital Markets Strategy Group synthesizes economic analysis and market outlooks from across Fidelity to provide timely, actionable perspectives for financial advisors and institutional investors.

Michael Scarsciotti
SVP, Head of Investment Specialists
Brad Pineault
Vice President, Head of Capital Market Strategists
David Delleo
Vice President, Investment Insights
Anu Gaggar
Vice President, Capital Markets Strategist
Seth Marks
Vice President, Capital Markets Strategist
Bryan Sajjadi
Vice President, Capital Markets Strategist