Why active ETFs, Why now?

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have steadily risen in prominence and assets since they were first developed in the early '90s. They've won the favor of both Wall Street traders and Main Street financial advisors by allowing investors to obtain exposure to passive strategies in a low-fee wrapper. But if much of the utility of ETFs derives from passive index-tracking, is an active ETF just an oxymoron? Far from it. Active ETFs have some unique advantages—and they're surging in popularity with investors and asset managers. Here's why.

History of the vehicle

The first exchange-traded fund, the S&P 500^®-tracking SPDR, launched 30 years ago. Active ETFs were slower to follow. A single short-term fixed income active ETF¹ was launched in 2008, but it took more than a decade for another asset management firm to expand on the experiment, even as overall assets held in ETFs climbed from $531 billion in 2008 to $7.9 trillion in 2021.²

An important new ruling from the SEC in 2019 helped revive interest in active ETFs. The SEC's updated regulations allowed for actively managed ETFs to create custom creation/redemption baskets, as well as the option to use a proxy portfolio for the fund's daily disclosures. The proxy portfolio closely approximates but does not precisely match the fund's holdings, allowing active portfolio managers to execute their strategy without immediately revealing their actions to the broader market. Perhaps most importantly, the new rules offered a more straightforward path for ETFs to be reviewed and approved by regulators, making it simpler to create and launch any style of ETF. Please see the disclosure below for risks of semi-transparent active equity ETFs.

Since the SEC's ruling, active ETF fund launches and inflows have risen quickly, with about 150 active ETFs debuting in 2020, a figure which nearly doubled to 291 in 2021.³ As of June 2023, there were over 1,100 active ETFs.⁴

Understanding the features of active ETFs

The spurt of investor interest in active ETFs is easy to understand: They combine some of the most useful features of ETFs with the advantages of active management. And because they're not bound to an index, managers can execute a broader range of strategies, such as thematic investing. Here are some of the features:

• Liquidity. Active ETFs trade intraday, providing liquidity and flexibility to investors during periods of volatility.
• Favorable tax treatment. Active ETFs can use in-kind redemptions, thereby accruing fewer capital gains for investors while they hold the fund (though capital gains may still be incurred when the shares of the ETFs are sold).
• Diversification. ETFs are composed of a portfolio of securities. Using a diversified investment to achieve active exposure, rather than investing in an individual stock or a bond, may help reduce portfolio risk.
• Transparent fee structure. Management fees for active ETFs are typically similar to those of traditional active funds. However, management fees are generally the only fees incurred with active ETFs, resulting in transparent fee structure, and often, lower overall costs. Because ETFs are simpler to manage for fund providers, the overall fees may be lower than those of a comparable mutual fund.
• Outperfomance is a goal. Active ETFs offer diverse strategies which may aim to outperform their benchmark through skill, rather than simply tracking an index. Outperformance is never a guarantee for any fund—but it's not the intention of an index ETF.
• Nimble when it's volatile. The portfolio managers of an active ETF have the ability to analyze the business cycle and trade proactively to try to insulate their strategies from shocks during periods of volatility.

Role in a portfolio

As the number of active ETFs has increased, so has the variety of strategies now being offered in the active ETF format from narrow sector-specific funds to those offering broad market exposure. Fixed income funds were among the first types of active ETFs to launch, and asset managers are now offering a wide variety of duration, yield, and sectors as active bond ETFs, allowing investors to achieve exposure to both core fixed income strategies and more specific niches like collateralized loans or emerging market bonds through the active ETF format. Similarly, while some active ETFs are run by managers taking a bottom-up, fundamental analysis approach, others apply a variety of quantitative approaches to seek enhanced alpha.

Like stocks, because they don't have to rely on an underlying index, active ETFs (like active mutual funds) can use many different investing strategies. For example, thematic active ETFs can invest across sectors in a general theme that investors feel may outperform, such as artificial intelligence or other disruptive technologies.

The wide range of investment approaches among active ETFs means that these funds can serve a variety of roles in a client portfolio, from achieving exposure to a narrow market niche, to seeking income generation, to possibly acting as a defensive hedge in periods of market volatility. Advisors looking to build out client portfolios may find that active ETFs provide additional opportunities.

Other considerations

The factors we mention above have certainly piqued investors' interest when it comes to active ETFs. But they're not a perfect tool in every situation or for every investor.

For example, while the ability to trade intraday and relative liquidity of ETFs help enable them to potentially be used for tax-loss harvesting, if generating tax-loss harvesting alpha in volatile markets is a priority a custom separately managed account or direct indexing solution may be a more powerful instrument (see "Comparing taxable approaches between ETFs and custom SMAs," below).

Additionally, investors often include active funds in their portfolios to seek outperformance. But even the best of portfolio managers may find their investing edge blunted as their funds grow more popular. As assets in a fund rise, portfolio managers often face the dilemma of either adding names in which they have less conviction or increasing concentration risk in their existing bets. Traditional active mutual fund managers can address this problem by closing their funds rather than diluting their strategy. Because they're exchange-traded, active ETFs cannot be closed to new investors in the same manner. Lastly, semi-transparent active ETFs may face greater arbitrage risk than passive ETFs or even active, but transparent, ETFs. With most exchange-traded funds, market makers can instantly spot differences between the ETF's share price and the prices of the underlying basket of securities the ETF holds, and such tracking errors are swiftly brought into line.

Conclusion

The expansion of active ETFs allows advisors and their clients to access a broader range of strategies through the ETF format. With an active ETF, investors don't lose any of the liquidity, fee transparency, and tax advantages that are the features of more common index ETFs. Even more, investors can select active ETFs that reflect their market views, and gain access to active managers who have the ability to set their own paths rather than simply following an index. In periods of strong market volatility, that can make an active ETF a useful tool in an investor's portfolio construction toolbox.